Wrestlemania Blunder

One of the biggest problems I've had with WM is that all the titles are not automatically on the line. This is the Mecca of sports entertainment. How can a champion not defend his title at WM. Just want to know if others think that all belts should be on the line at WM

No. That's what Night of Champions is for. And quite frankly, something like Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels, despite having no titles on the line is obviously far more meaningful than something involving Michelle McCool or something. That's the worst possible example I could give but still, some title matches would just take up air-time and wouldn't really be Mania caliber matches. And since there is like 8 titles, it wouldn't leave much room for anything else anyway.

That-Damn-Good wrote:

No. That's what Night of Champions is for. And quite frankly, something like Undertaker vs Shawn Michaels, despite having no titles on the line is obviously far more meaningful than something involving Michelle McCool or something. That's the worst possible example I could give but still, some title matches would just take up air-time and wouldn't really be Mania caliber matches. And since there is like 8 titles, it wouldn't leave much room for anything else anyway.

That pretty much summed it up.

I say both Heavywieght titles must be on the line, either the US or IC title, and either Woman's or Diva's title.

I dunno i agree with BEAST i would like to see them all on the line as well....

I mean come on this is wrestlemania for crying out loud. How does the IC champion or US champion gets a by. Let alone not even wrestle. Glad they found a way to include Drew in WM but would rather see him with his title on the line.