The G thread

This thread is made to cut raps and adore our Gs, such as Chris Brown, Tupac and Eminem. Chris Brown is a real G, he don't let no bitches tell him what to do, he just keeps his pimp hand strong.

The G thread? Guys that abuse women? What you think its right that men beat women...lol men that beat women deserve to get there thing in there pants cut off a real man dont beat women

And not trying to start anything just my opinion your not a real man if your gonna beat your wife/GF thats just wrong

^^^^^^
And that's a G String for the G thread.

Women are pretty much the biggest hypocrites in the world. The preach to be equal with men, with rights and all but, when something like the Jericho issue happens, they all bitch and complain and say it's wrong for men to hit women, if their on equal ground, their shouldn't suppose to be a problem with that, because if a man did the same thing to Jericho, he would of, punched the man. Their is an old saying, beggers can't be choosers. Don't beg (demand) for equality if you only want the postives to it and not the negatives. Their is a price to pay for it. Jericho had a right to hit the women. As for Brown, I read some details on the attack and he probably went to far (doesn't matter to me if it's man or woman), that is if the source is correct. This is the source btw...

Quote :

NME News

LAPD details of Chris Brown beating of Rihanna revealed
Rihanna
Notes say he repeatedly punched and bit her

Mar 5, 2009
0 Comments
Chris Brown news, reviews, video and tour dates
Add Chris Brown to MyNME
Details of the alleged attack on Rihanna by her boyfriend Chris Brown have been revealed via Los Angeles Police Department detective notes.

The notes say that Brown shoved Rihanna’s head against the window of his car, repeatedly punched and bit her and put her in a headlock so that she almost lost consciousness.

He also reportedly yelled at her "I'm going to beat the **** out of you when we get home. You wait and see."

The alleged attack happened after Rihanna read a text message from a woman on Brown’s phone. He tried to push her out of the car, a rented Lamborghini, but she was wearing a seatbelt. He then assaulted her, reports Fox News.

The police notes say there was blood spattered on Rihanna’s clothing and the interior of the car.

Rihanna apparently called her assistant telling her to have the police waiting when she got home and Brown reportedly said, "You just did the stupidest thing ever. I'm going to kill you."

Brown was today charged with two felonies and is due to be arraigned this afternoon on the charges, which are listed as assault likely to cause great bodily injury and making criminal threats.

--By our New York staff.

Meh, Chris Jericho hitting the bitch was justified, but with Brown, if the reports are true, then he is a real asshole.

Y2J X wrote:

Women are pretty much the biggest hypocrites in the world. The preach to be equal with men, with rights and all but, when something like the Jericho issue happens, they all bitch and complain and say it's wrong for men to hit women, if their on equal ground, their shouldn't suppose to be a problem with that, because if a man did the same thing to Jericho, he would of, punched the man. Their is an old saying, beggers can't be choosers. Don't beg (demand) for equality if you only want the postives to it and not the negatives. Their is a price to pay for it. Jericho had a right to hit the women. As for Brown, I read some details on the attack and he probably went to far (doesn't matter to me if it's man or woman), that is if the source is correct. This is the source btw...

Quote :

NME News

LAPD details of Chris Brown beating of Rihanna revealed
Rihanna
Notes say he repeatedly punched and bit her

Mar 5, 2009
0 Comments
Chris Brown news, reviews, video and tour dates
Add Chris Brown to MyNME
Details of the alleged attack on Rihanna by her boyfriend Chris Brown have been revealed via Los Angeles Police Department detective notes.

The notes say that Brown shoved Rihanna’s head against the window of his car, repeatedly punched and bit her and put her in a headlock so that she almost lost consciousness.

He also reportedly yelled at her "I'm going to beat the **** out of you when we get home. You wait and see."

The alleged attack happened after Rihanna read a text message from a woman on Brown’s phone. He tried to push her out of the car, a rented Lamborghini, but she was wearing a seatbelt. He then assaulted her, reports Fox News.

The police notes say there was blood spattered on Rihanna’s clothing and the interior of the car.

Rihanna apparently called her assistant telling her to have the police waiting when she got home and Brown reportedly said, "You just did the stupidest thing ever. I'm going to kill you."

Brown was today charged with two felonies and is due to be arraigned this afternoon on the charges, which are listed as assault likely to cause great bodily injury and making criminal threats.

--By our New York staff.

Well I agree that it should be equal rights no matter what. That's just like if you hit a black man its a hate crime, you hit a white man its assault.

xDesireAngelx wrote:

The G thread? Guys that abuse women? What you think its right that men beat women...lol men that beat women deserve to get there thing in there pants cut off a real man dont beat women

And not trying to start anything just my opinion your not a real man if your gonna beat your wife/GF thats just wrong

You mean a penis. It is very nice.

Y2J X wrote:

Women are pretty much the biggest hypocrites in the world. The preach to be equal with men, with rights and all but, when something like the Jericho issue happens, they all bitch and complain and say it's wrong for men to hit women, if their on equal ground, their shouldn't suppose to be a problem with that, because if a man did the same thing to Jericho, he would of, punched the man. Their is an old saying, beggers can't be choosers. Don't beg (demand) for equality if you only want the postives to it and not the negatives. Their is a price to pay for it. Jericho had a right to hit the women. As for Brown, I read some details on the attack and he probably went to far (doesn't matter to me if it's man or woman), that is if the source is correct. This is the source btw...

I agree that a woman who pick a fight with a man should be ready to back it up since we're supposed to be equal, but abuse on a defenceless woman who didn't do anything wrong is bad. There's a big difference between the two.

TheRealFan wrote:

Y2J X wrote:

Women are pretty much the biggest hypocrites in the world. The preach to be equal with men, with rights and all but, when something like the Jericho issue happens, they all bitch and complain and say it's wrong for men to hit women, if their on equal ground, their shouldn't suppose to be a problem with that, because if a man did the same thing to Jericho, he would of, punched the man. Their is an old saying, beggers can't be choosers. Don't beg (demand) for equality if you only want the postives to it and not the negatives. Their is a price to pay for it. Jericho had a right to hit the women. As for Brown, I read some details on the attack and he probably went to far (doesn't matter to me if it's man or woman), that is if the source is correct. This is the source btw...

I agree that a woman who pick a fight with a man should be ready to back it up since we're supposed to be equal, but abuse on a defenceless woman who didn't do anything wrong is bad. There's a big difference between the two.

Like, I said it that post, if the source is correct, Brown definitly crossed the line. I don't trust everything that gets posted on the web, even if it's been posted on a couple of reliable sites, it could all just be made up, once something like that happens things easily get blown out of proption. It happened before and I haven't really keeped up with the mass details.

Oh, also I wasn't defending Brown, if thats what your thinking. I was pointing out the hypocritcy women seem to have when it comes to equal rights and used Jericho as an example, if I though Brown's actions were jusitified I would of just used him as an example seeing as how DesireAngel's comments about men hitting women being wrong stemed from Brown being called a G by Bolty.

^No, I understood what you meant, I was just agreeing with what you said.

brown is a bitch slapper i say "HELL YEAH" chris you should of hit her harder lol

Manu Soldier wrote:

brown is a bitch slapper i say "HELL YEAH" chris you should of hit her harder lol

Ahahahahahaha.

What the fuck.

Manu Soldier wrote:

brown is a bitch slapper i say "HELL YEAH" chris you should of hit her harder lol

Fuck your mad manu, Like seriously acting like you do trying to sound rebellious and your like what 6. You'll be smoking by 10 years old i know it.

Trying to sound cool by saying how he should of hit her harder is plain stupid and just shows you have never had a girlfriend because if you did you wouldnt leave a comment like that.

Manu Soldier wrote:

brown is a bitch slapper i say "HELL YEAH" chris you should of hit her harder lol

Cant i Hit You

The Luke-Man aka Hovy wrote:

Manu Soldier wrote:

brown is a bitch slapper i say "HELL YEAH" chris you should of hit her harder lol

Cant i Hit You

No Luke, Violence against women, CGS says no

Sykesy wrote:

The Luke-Man aka Hovy wrote:

Manu Soldier wrote:

brown is a bitch slapper i say "HELL YEAH" chris you should of hit her harder lol

Cant i Hit You

No Luke, Violence against women, CGS says no

Ehehehehehehehehehe.

Just remember what Chris Brown says...

"You can never hit a woman, but you can always slappabitch"

lol I kid I kid.

Seriously, don't hit women.

stl311 wrote:

Seriously, don't hit women.

Unless they have it coming.

I kid, I kid.

How is any of this funny?

Slegna wrote:

stl311 wrote:

Seriously, don't hit women.

Unless they have it coming.

I kid, I kid.

So, you two and others are saying, if a woman shot at one of your family members, that doesn't make it right to just punch her? However, if a man did it, then it would be alright to hit the man. Am I the only one who sees who sexist that logic is? Normally when people think about something sexist, they think about something against women, but in reality it can be against women or men. Kind of like how rasict could be agaisnt any race. Seriously, and an ideal world violence outside of some forms of entertainment (boxing, wrestling, MMA, etc.) would not exsist. Since that world is impossible to create, can we at least stop having sexism viewed in one way. I'm not saying you should punch women or men for that matter for stupid reasons but, if they actually tried started something or were really harassing you then go ahead, you shouldn't feel bad. If a woman shot one of my family members, I definitly punch her. If she shot one of my family members and then pointed the gun at me I'd punch her. Same thing if it was a male doing it.

Y2J X wrote:

Slegna wrote:

stl311 wrote:

Seriously, don't hit women.

Unless they have it coming.

I kid, I kid.

So, you two and others are saying, if a woman shot at one of your family members, that doesn't make it right to just punch her? However, if a man did it, then it would be alright to hit the man. Am I the only one who sees who sexist that logic is? Normally when people think about something sexist, they think about something against women, but in reality it can be against women or men. Kind of like how rasict could be agaisnt any race. Seriously, and an ideal world violence outside of some forms of entertainment (boxing, wrestling, MMA, etc.) would not exsist. Since that world is impossible to create, can we at least stop having sexism viewed in one way. I'm not saying you should punch women or men for that matter for stupid reasons but, if they actually tried started something or were really harassing you then go ahead, you shouldn't feel bad. If a woman shot one of my family members, I definitly punch her. If she shot one of my family members and then pointed the gun at me I'd punch her. Same thing if it was a male doing it.

Y2J X, you know my stance on how racism and sexism isn't a one way street.

Do I have to tell the story of the speeding ticket again?

The system and society are both fucked.

Period.

Rhianna didn't need to be hit, but dammit the other woman did.

And another thing.

How come certain sites ban the word (pardon my language) nigger?

Yet they allow the words (pardon me again folks) Cracker, Honky, Camel Jockey, Kike, Spic, Span, Wetback, Beaner, Dyke, and of course picnic (which in the old south meant to lynch an african american)

Source on Picnic: http://www.cracked.com/article_16967_8-racist-words-you-use-every-day.html

The point is, in society racism and sexism is only one way.

Everyone knows that.

I gotsa feeling I'm getting ready to get heat for this.

stl311 wrote:

Y2J X, you know my stance on how racism and sexism isn't a one way street.

Do I have to tell the story of the speeding ticket again?

The system and society are both fucked.

Period.

Rhianna didn't need to be hit, but dammit the other woman did.

And another thing.

How come certain sites ban the word (pardon my language) nigger?

Yet they allow the words (pardon me again folks) Cracker, Honky, Camel Jockey, Kike, Spic, Span, Wetback, Beaner, Dyke, and of course picnic (which in the old south meant to lynch an african american)

Because of the person who made the site? I've been on a site that allowed no racial slurs and some that allowed all. I think I've been on one that was reverse from what you said but, I can't remember. It's all depends on who made the site, which shows different things about the person who made it, and no it doesn't show the racist, it could show that the like freedom of speech but, once again it depends on the person who makes the site.

Quote :

Source on Picnic: http://www.cracked.com/article_16967_8-racist-words-you-use-every-day.html

http://www.allabouthistory.org/origin-of-the-word-picnic-faq.htm

This says it's not. Thats not the only one either, in fact THAT site says it isn't. Let me quote it...

Quote :

www.cracked.com/articleimages/dan/racist_words/picnic.jpg" border="0" alt=""/>
How it's Used:
"Wow, look at that! The sun's shining, the bluebirds are singing ... why, I think it's a lovely day for a picnic!"
What You're Actually Saying:
"Wow, look at that! The sun's shining, the bluebirds are singing ... why, I think it's a lovely day to lynch a black person!"
www.cracked.com/articleimages/dan/racist_words/picnic2.jpg" border="0" alt=""/>
Actually, no, this is what you're really saying:
"Wow, look at that! The sun's shining, the bluebirds are singing ... why, I think it's a lovely day for a picnic!"
Wait, What?
Confused? We're including this one just to save everybody the trouble down in the comments. If you bring up the topic of racist words, it's usually only minutes before some helpful expert will chime in with:

"Did you know 'picnic' dates back to lynching parties? It's true, 'picnic' is short for 'pick a n*gger.' As in, pick one to lynch. So when you eat sandwiches in the park, the blood of African Americans stains your very checkered tablecloth. Enjoy your sandwich, bigot."

This one, however, is bullshit. According to Snopes.com, the word "picnic" actually derives from the totally innocuous French word "piquenique." The other, horrible meaning of the word is found nowhere outside of that one idiotic email forward.

So it was never a euphemism for anything. Or even a real phrase. And if you believed that email, then we have some penis enlarging pills to sell you.

All I did was copy and past the text and link to the pictures. So, did you stop reading after the picture, or were you trying to trick me because your source is saying that it's not or never been a racial slur.

Even so, their are mutliple words with multiple definitions, sometimes because of different locations. For example (although this isn't a word) in one place (I don't remember where) thumbs up is their equalivent of the middle finger. Does that mean when I give someone the thumbs up here, I'm flipping the bird? No of course it doesn't/

Quote :

The point is, in society racism and sexism is only one way.

Everyone knows that.

Mainstream yeah sure but, it depends, really. I've talked to males who are more sexists towards other males then females. I never talked to somebody who was racists against black people. I've talked to people who might be rasict to hispanics and russians (possibly). The point is around the age group (14-16,) I am, racism doesn't go against blacks. I also doubt Obamam would be president if racism was only one way.

I'm going to say it depends were you live and age group.

Quote :

I gotsa feeling I'm getting ready to get heat for this.

You shouldn't...

Y2J X wrote:

stl311 wrote:

Y2J X, you know my stance on how racism and sexism isn't a one way street.

Do I have to tell the story of the speeding ticket again?

The system and society are both fucked.

Period.

Rhianna didn't need to be hit, but dammit the other woman did.

And another thing.

How come certain sites ban the word (pardon my language) nigger?

Yet they allow the words (pardon me again folks) Cracker, Honky, Camel Jockey, Kike, Spic, Span, Wetback, Beaner, Dyke, and of course picnic (which in the old south meant to lynch an african american)

Because of the person who made the site? I've been on a site that allowed no racial slurs and some that allowed all. I think I've been on one that was reverse from what you said but, I can't remember. It's all depends on who made the site, which shows different things about the person who made it, and no it doesn't show the racist, it could show that the like freedom of speech but, once again it depends on the person who makes the site.

Quote :

Source on Picnic: http://www.cracked.com/article_16967_8-racist-words-you-use-every-day.html

http://www.allabouthistory.org/origin-of-the-word-picnic-faq.htm

This says it's not. Thats not the only one either, in fact THAT site says it isn't. Let me quote it...

Quote :

www.cracked.com/articleimages/dan/racist_words/picnic.jpg" border="0" alt=""/>
How it's Used:
"Wow, look at that! The sun's shining, the bluebirds are singing ... why, I think it's a lovely day for a picnic!"
What You're Actually Saying:
"Wow, look at that! The sun's shining, the bluebirds are singing ... why, I think it's a lovely day to lynch a black person!"
www.cracked.com/articleimages/dan/racist_words/picnic2.jpg" border="0" alt=""/>
Actually, no, this is what you're really saying:
"Wow, look at that! The sun's shining, the bluebirds are singing ... why, I think it's a lovely day for a picnic!"
Wait, What?
Confused? We're including this one just to save everybody the trouble down in the comments. If you bring up the topic of racist words, it's usually only minutes before some helpful expert will chime in with:

"Did you know 'picnic' dates back to lynching parties? It's true, 'picnic' is short for 'pick a n*gger.' As in, pick one to lynch. So when you eat sandwiches in the park, the blood of African Americans stains your very checkered tablecloth. Enjoy your sandwich, bigot."

This one, however, is bullshit. According to Snopes.com, the word "picnic" actually derives from the totally innocuous French word "piquenique." The other, horrible meaning of the word is found nowhere outside of that one idiotic email forward.

So it was never a euphemism for anything. Or even a real phrase. And if you believed that email, then we have some penis enlarging pills to sell you.

All I did was copy and past the text and link to the pictures. So, did you stop reading after the picture, or were you trying to trick me because your source is saying that it's not or never been a racial slur.

Even so, their are mutliple words with multiple definitions, sometimes because of different locations. For example (although this isn't a word) in one place (I don't remember where) thumbs up is their equalivent of the middle finger. Does that mean when I give someone the thumbs up here, I'm flipping the bird? No of course it doesn't/

Quote :

The point is, in society racism and sexism is only one way.

Everyone knows that.

Mainstream yeah sure but, it depends, really. I've talked to males who are more sexists towards other males then females. I never talked to somebody who was racists against black people. I've talked to people who might be rasict to hispanics and russians (possibly). The point is around the age group (14-16,) I am, racism doesn't go against blacks. I also doubt Obamam would be president if racism was only one way.

I'm going to say it depends were you live and age group.

Quote :

I gotsa feeling I'm getting ready to get heat for this.

You shouldn't...

Leave it to you to find that flaw.

Asshole.



My point is several chat servers won't allow certain racial slurs, but allow others. And certain "free forums" do the exact same thing.

Just saying.

first of all im 14 and i wont smoke ever, secondly i was jokin around lol take a joke