who do you like more? HBK or Undertaker

I like Shawn Michaels, hes my fav wrestler

Ooooh, that's tough.

Man that's tough... ummm....


I'm gonna say HBK.

Taker by far,Here is why:

Taker since 1990 has stuck with the same allignment and same attitude even if he doesnt use the mic.He plays everything out nicey for example his hell in the cell with mick.Even though it was rehearsed and he landed how he was suppose to i would still be scared after i did something like that to a man.

While HBK can always over sell soemthing like the famous flip in the corner it really pisses me off.Also his match at summerslam 2005 were he gets hit by a big boot by hogan and jumps around everywhere it reminds me of the stunner that austin did on vince.

The Undertaker has gone through nearly 18 years of WWE commitment while HBK was out for 4+ years.I know HBK couldnt help that but it really shows how much more taker has offered to the fans and the wrestling industry.Also taker has been underused and it seems that WWE is not letting A veteran like the undertaker make doors for newer talent while they let HBK do all the work which makes people think HBK is so much better which in my opinion he isnt.

Well ther eis my two cents

Taker FTW!

Both great in their own respects, but I just think Taker has been a more consistent and better performer. He's still able to pull off a more far-out gimmick for so much longer. He's been able to expand his moveset and not just settle on what he has had for the longest time. He's one of the most consistent sellers and never complains or needs the championship reigns.

i have to go with taker.
after such a long time in the wrestling, he's just getting better from match to match and from year to year.
HBK is a great wrestler and a great preformer, but personally i prefer taker.

Easily Shawn Michaels for me. The Undertaker is a legend in pro wrestling, he's beaten some of the best in great matches and has been an innovator of matches like Hell in a Cell and Buried Alive. He's taken part of some of the most heated rivalries in WWE history and is still one of their biggest draws today. But he has some flaws, his mic work is good but is not a patch on HBK. Michaels has way more charisma and is a more entertaining wrestler. He has a more varied moveset and is arguably more popular. The Undertaker's deadman gimmick is getting stale again like it did back in 1999. The whole deadman thingy is pretty stupid really and if he debuted today in WWE, the fans wouldn't be interested. That character could only of succeeded back then, when those kind of crazy persona's were welcomed. 'Taker has also been part of some shocking matches over the years and only really started turning into the worker he today, back in 1997. Before then he was incredibly dull. Yes, he's been in some great feuds but he's also been in some really stupid and long winded one's too. Shawn Michaels was the first grand slam champion, he formed DX, he has charisma, he's still an awesome wrestler. He actually puts a lot of guys over rather than just turning up for a couple of main event feuds a year. HBK hasn't held a belt that means something since 2002 despite being Raw's most consistant wrestler. Someone said that The Undertaker is getting better every year and every match. That is wrong, he is getting worse. At his age, there is no way he's getting better. He's hit his peak and is winding down now. Someone else said something about HBK being out longer. Think how many time's the deadman's been out whether it's a real injury or a kayfabe one? It's way longer than Michaels. HBK has been in a ton more matches and most of them were better than Taker's. Shawn Michaels is clearly the better wrestler in my opinion.

This is such an easy question, it's got to be HBK he is argueabley one of the greatest ever. And has had so many classic matches over the years, he is awesome on the mic. HBK's accomplishments are endless which tells you that WWE had alot of faith in HBK's talent.

Undertaker on the other hand is one of the most boring wrestlers, his matches are slow his gimmick has been worn out, his mic skills don't match up to HBK and neither does the quality of his matches.

i like shawn michaels better

HBK is good but I think Taker's better in my opinion.

i cannot decide both of them has them good things what i like.....maybe I am closer a bit to Taker....!!!But I really set a high value on Hbk...

HBK. No question. Shawn was in the company longer than Taker. 20 years. He is also a better performer than Taker. No doubt better on the mic. Shawn has accomplished great things in his career and so has Taker. But Shawn more. Shawn is largly known from two teams. DX and the Rockers. Both were great. Shawn has had even more sucess as a singles compettor. As for Taker. He pretty much lives of his streak. It's something that seperates him from the lockerroom and too some porption WWE will lose something. It also makes me less exicted for Mania. At least hs match because I'll know he'll win. Shawn does not have a good record infact it stinks. 3-8. But he's been in the main event the most times. It makes it alittle better for my anticapation. In my opinion HBK is just better than Taker. Sorry Deadman, plus I'm still a fan but there is no comparsion to HBK.

its been buggin me, why does hbk go by mr. wrestlemania when hes 3-8?

I picked the the Showstopper and here is why. Wrestling is fake and fixed and it is about entertainment. And in all of wrestling i cant think of anyone more entertaining then Shawn michales. He always did his gimmicks so well that even when he was a heel you still liked him. He competed in the first ladder match which was one of the best of all time matches in my opinion. That 1 hour iron man match was a great show put on by him and Bret. DX was a great faction which had to be the most entertaining faction ever in wrestling.... EVER. Sure he was gone for 4 years but when he came back he came back clean and no longer hard to deal with. This was tough because i really like taker too, but entertainment is the WWE and HBK is Entertainment.

That's my story and i am sticking to it.

Definatly the Under Taker.....He takes care of his own business no matter what that business is...