Raw AM beats Impact

Sourcehttp://rajah.com/base/node/12601

Quote :

This past weekend's AM Raw drew a strong 1.1 cable rating, actually beating out last week's TNA iMPACT! - which drew a 1.0. Certainly not good news for TNA, getting beat by a show that airs on Saturday night at 2:00 AM.

That is the funnest thing I have heard in a while....TNA is a million miles away from the WWE...

This genuinely made me laugh! Although, all wrestling other than TNA and SD air around 2AM in the UK.

TNA is blowin up right behind WWE 4 broadcast of the week...Stick with it TNA and one day you will be the WWE's weekly clip show at 2 AM

With the low budget of TNA, they don't need the high ratings to make a profit. Yes the higher the ratings the more profit, but I'm not sure whether they even need a 1.0 rating to be making money, which of course is what all companies want to do.

babaganoosh wrote:

With the low budget of TNA, they don't need the high ratings to make a profit. Yes the higher the ratings the more profit, but I'm not sure whether they even need a 1.0 rating to be making money, which of course is what all companies want to do.

TNA may be turning a profit, but they are no where near the WWE financially or in viewership and that is what I loved about this....Some people say that TNA is making it's mark or that it is better then the WWE. TNA is so much better that they can't even beat Raw AM in the ratings, that is what I love about this story..

Concrete Jesus wrote:

TNA may be turning a profit, but they are no where near the WWE financially

Maybe because WWE had a collosal headstart.

Well if you take the TNA mark's opinion about TNA being better than WWE, then yeah you'll get a good laugh out of this. However, if you take a realistic look at it, all they want is to make money regardless of how fast it comes in. So I still view TNA as successful (if indeed they are making money, I really don't have their financials with me) and realistically, nowhere close to WWE's success.

babaganoosh wrote:

Well if you take the TNA mark's opinion about TNA being better than WWE, then yeah you'll get a good laugh out of this. However, if you take a realistic look at it, all they want is to make money regardless of how fast it comes in. So I still view TNA as successful (if indeed they are making money, I really don't have their financials with me) and realistically, nowhere close to WWE's success.

That is a great point but I have one thing to say to TNA marks and there 5th best wresting program on national or cable TV, SUCK IT

Well lets see WWE has been here for like 30 or 40 years so people know WWE alot better than TNA. But I really don't care bout ratings cause there just ratings. I mean atleast they keep there fans every week.